Godswill Ministries
Anti-Religious Righteousness


Insight

April 18, 2012

The Bible is Pro-Choice

swillkills

You often hear Christians claiming that abortion is against their biblical beliefs, but what does the bible really say about abortion?  What the bible really says actually places it in the camp of not just Pro-Choice, but Pro-Abortion and Pro-Violence toward children.

People/Children are Property in the Bible

Some Christians claim Exodus 21:22-25 proves that fetuses are protected under the Law of Moses.  Is this true?  No.  Exodus 21 is largely a chapter discussing the laws of property.  The practices and beliefs of ancient Near East cultures is well established by historians, archaeologists, and scholars – women and children were often viewed as property.

This can be briefly shown by a cursory examination of the other laws in Exodus 21.  Verse 7 plainly allows fathers can sell their daughters as slaves: “When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she shall not go out as the male slaves do.”  Life was cheap.  The lives of human property (slaves) were not held in high esteem as verses 20-21 states “when a man strikes his slave, male or female, with a rod and the slave dies under his hand, he shall be avenged.  But if the slave survives a day or two, he is not to be avenged, for the slave is his money.”  Men could sell their daughters into slavery; meanwhile slaves, male or female, could be freely beaten with rods – so long as you didn’t immediately kill them.

The New Testament does not break from the brutal practice of slavery.  Paul, instead of recommending Philemon free his slave Onesimus, returns the slave and tells them to be good slaves and masters.  Other passages command Christian slaves to be obedient to their masters (pagan or otherwise).

The Value of the Lives of Children in the Bible

What of the value placed on a child’s life?  Deuteronomy 20:10-18 commands that innocent Canaanite babies and infants, be slaughtered alongside their parents, grandparents, and even livestock.  This obviously includes pregnant women and their unborn fetuses.

After wars with non-Canaanite nations, cattle, women, and children are to be taken as “spoils of war.”  Non-Canaanite children were taken as slaves.  They were slaves their entire lives since non-Jewish slaves were not subject to the laws demanding their release on Jubilee years – “When you buy a Hebrew slave, he shall serve six years, and in the seventh he shall go out free, for nothing” (Exodus 21:2).

How could 3 month old Canaanites be the threat verse 18 claims they will be?  The answer is, they are no threat – this is genocide plain and simple. This is clear because other “wicked” and pagan children, were not considered a threat.  Assyrians, Babylonians, or any others, except for Canaanites, could be kept as child-slaves.

The most disgusting example of the Bible’s value of the lives of children can be seen in the taking of young, little, Midianite, virgin girls in Numbers 31. After their families, including their male siblings, were slaughtered, god commanded the little virgin girls be divided as “spoils of war.”  In this myth, they were treated no better than livestock “Now the plunder remaining of the spoil that the army took was 675,000 sheep, 72,000 cattle, 61,000 donkeys, and 32,000 persons in all, women who had not known man by lying with him.” (Numbers 31:32-35).  Here the bible justifies the sex-slavery of under-aged little girls.

Parental Infanticide in the Bible

Back to Exodus 21.  Verse 17 clearly states “whoever curses his father or his mother shall be put to death.”  If you’ve ever gotten into a fight with your parents and cursed them, the bible says you should be executed.  If your child has ADD or is otherwise “rebellious” or troubled, Deuteronomy 21:19 says “his father and his mother shall take hold of him and bring him out to the elders of his city at the gate of the place where he lives” and as verse 21 says “all the men of the city shall stone him to death with stones.  So you shall purge the evil from your midst, and all Israel shall hear, and fear.”  The bible tells parents to kill their own children.  Late term abortions?  How about post-third trimester abortions?!

The apologist will say “this is only if the child is evil and rebellious, it is a special circumstance.”  Most pro-choice advocates do not want abortions as a primary form of birth control, rather they feel abortion is necessary in special circumstances, such as the health of the mother being at risk or the fetus being seriously and medically abnormal.

The Bible Contains an Abortion Ritual

In any case, the apologist defense is rendered false by their own bible.  Numbers 5:11-31 contains an abortion ritual.  The reason for terminating the pregnancy? Infidelity.  If a paranoid husband thinks his wife cheated, but lacks the legal proof (the witness of two men, which is flawed justice in its own right, subject to abuse), he is to take his wife to the high priest.  The priest whips up a magical concoction with water and the dust and ashes from around the altar and makes her drink it.  If she is innocent, nothing happens.  If she cheated on her husband though, she becomes ill and the child of infidelity is aborted.

Women and Children are the Property of Men

Let’s return to the Christian’s defense at Exodus 21:22-25.  “When men strive together and hit a pregnant woman, so that her children come out, but there is no harm, the one who hit her shall surely be fined, as the woman’s husband shall impose on him, and he shall pay as the judges determine.  But if there is harm, then you shall pay life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.”  Who is the victim here?  The husband, for “the one who hit her shall surely be fined, as the woman’s husband shall impose on him.”  The victim is not the fetus, it is the husband whose property, i.e. his wife and/or a potential child, was nearly damaged.  Forget about the fact that this “eye for an eye” crap was stolen by the Israelites from the older Code of Hammurabi… historical, archaeological, and even biblical evidence supports the fact that children were viewed as property and were abused, genocided (Canaanites), raped (Midianites), and treated as livestock.

Personhood in the Womb, Life Quality After Birth.

Many Christians reply with a variety of poetic Psalms where the author claims god knew him personally in the womb (as a brain-less zygote?  As a person-less blastocyst?), or that god himself formed the psalmist in the womb, etc.  One example often used is Psalm 22:10 “from my mother’s womb you have been my God.”

Biblical poetry also offers an opposing view though.  The prophet character Jeremiah poetically mused “Cursed be the day on which I was born!  [...]  because he did not kill me in the womb, so my mother would have been my grave!  […]  Why did I come out from the womb to see toil and sorrow, and spend my days in shame?” (Jeremiah 20:14, 17, 18).

Born into poverty?  Born to parents dying of disease?  Born only to starve to death within a year or two? Pious old Jeremiah would have been Pro-Choice simply for these type of quality-of-life reasons.

The bible is clearly Pro-Choice… so, like Numbers 5:11-31 says, if you get knocked up, have a drink (or twelve) and get rid of that little rug-rat.

Edit:

The word often used for “thigh” in Numbers 5 is “yarek” in the original Hebrew.  It can mean thigh, loins, or represent offspring.  For instance “yarek” is used in Genesis 46:26 to say all of Jacob’s children “which sprang from his loins (yarek).”

Most modern translations simply translate yarek as “thigh” in Numbers 5, so it may be hard to read the explicit abortion in this kind of artificial subtext caused by later English translations – it is much more explicit in the original Hebrew.  It is not her “thigh that rots or falls away” – it is her loins, womb, or FETUS



About the Author

Brother Razi

.

Muhammad ibn Zakariya al-Razi – while Catholic priests love to rape little altar boys, I prefer goats and other desert herding animals.  My favorite hobbies are spousal abuse (Qu’ran 4:34) and marrying 6 year old girls named Aisha then fucking them when they turn 9 years old like the Prophet Muhammad (Piss Be Upon him) did (hadith of al-Bukhari, volume 5, book 58, number 234).

.

I also like washing my balls with an odd number of rocks as the hadiths in the Book of Wudu command (hadith of al-Bukhari, volume 1, book 4, number 142).  I also like calling out people who fart in Mosque.  It is a Hadath-Asghar (minor ritual impurity), and one must leave salat (prayer) to ritually cleanse himself before praying again (hadith of al-Bukhari, volume 1, book 4, number 176).  I one day aspire to strap a bomb to myself, until then I’ll just jack off to violent images of women being treated like shit.

.






18 Comments


  1. Keenan

    You make some valid points you have done your research. Thank you forgiving a different perspective and yes I am a christian. Your right by saying that Christians shouldn’t use Exodus, Genesis, or any other of the 5 to back up there beliefs because most of the time they don’t know what there talking about. So since i heard of your view point can you just listen to me for a second. The only reason why there is laws in the old testament is because of the sin of man. Sin, the reason for lust, pride, and other that other stuff. Well let me just get to the point, Christians do know this that Jesus died for sins. What the crap does that mean? It means that the law that was written in the old testament and all the sin that happened with man is taking away once you believe in God. Know I understand you must think that this christian guy is crazy and he doesn’t know what he is talking about, but just hold on for on second because by reading your article I know your a pretty cool guy that wants to get the truth of the bible. 1 Peter3:18 says ”
    For Christ also died for sins once for all, the just for the unjust, so that He might bring us to God, having been put to death in the flesh, but made alive in the spirit;”New American Standard Bible (©1995). Well how does this relate to abortion? This relates to abortion because if God loved us so much that he born all sin and the whole law and everything that we may come to now him. Why would he let someone not receive this chance. I know that you may think i am dumb or stupid, but please understand that the whole bases of Christianity isn’t based on laws. Well what then is it based on? Love

    GD Star Rating
    loading...

    • Keenan

      Ps: Sorry for people who call themselves Christians and don’t live it out. For they dwindle the whole basis of Christianity.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...

      • Gus

        Nothing more pathetic than a groveling, whimpering, mealymouthed “Christian”, uttering apologies in response to one of the silliest biblical interpretations I’ve ever heard. Focus on getting understanding, and let these attention seeking God haters babble their silly foolishness.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...

    • DirkvD

      Christians keep saying that their Christ died for our sins thus nullifying the laws set down by Moses in Leviticus. Yet the man you call Jesus, specifically stated you were to follow the laws of Moses. If Paul is correct and all these laws are irrelevant, then why are your kind always quoting Leviticus 20:13? Does Jesus list anywhere what laws are cancelled and what are to be continued? Come to think of it did Paul and Jesus ever meet? I’ve read Paul met James but did they agree on each others teachings of the word of your Christ? I’ll end off by asking you to read the porn that is your book Ezekiel 23:20.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...

    • Sal

      You aren’t stupid, but while the concept and idea of Jesus being a proxy isn’t comparable to the treachery of the old testament, let’s just get to the point: Jesus was a GREAT GUY, but he wasn’t God. Yup. He died so that you would have a shot at knowing the truth, not so that you can get a ticket to Heaven. “Heaven” is nothing but the sky, the atmosphere, and outer space.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...

  2. christian AND intelligent

    I actually feel stupid for having read this article. I would like to point out to you that the Bible, as well as a religious scripture, is a source of ancient history. Many secular historians look to the Bible, not for its religious material, but for the historical outlet. The bible has been used in many cases to fill in missing information of the laws and goings on in that time. History was not referenced in the Bible to give simple minds justification to lash out against institutions that don’t think the way you think. History is recounted in the Bible as a reference point, as a means to exhibit that in those times, much like these times, that there is a disconnect between the laws and how a christian is to act and conduct themselves. Followers were condemned, killed, and sent from their homes for not adhering to the laws that you suggest the Bible advocates. I would like to ask you where in the bible do the words of Jesus Christ or his followers advocate for any of the historical facts you mentioned in your writings. I am sorry you are so empty and sad in your life that you feel the need to tear down the beliefs of others, so that you add justification to your ideals. It is clear that you don’t hold the same belief system as I do. I feel no ill will toward you, I just feel sorry for you and pray that you might find light in all the darkness that surrounds you.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...

    • Brother Razi

      I feel stupid for having read your comment. At the risk of insulting my Christian friends, your handle “christian AND intelligent” is often an oxymoron in my experience.

      Pray away. While you’re at it pray for tonight’s Lotto numbers… prayer is about as useful as talking to yourself or to an imaginary friend… because that is exactly what prayer is.

      You ask where Jesus advocates the Old Testament laws? Are you serious? The Jesus of the highly embellished, and often inconsistent gospels, commands his followers to obey “every jot and tittle” of the OT laws or Torah (Mark 10:17-19; Matthew 5:17-18; Matthew 19:17; Luke 16:16-17; etc). It was Paul, who in direct opposition to Jesus’ clear words (or the words inserted into his mouth by biased gospel authors decades later), claimed Christians could jettison the entire Mosaic law (references are too many to cite).

      For what it’s worth, Jesus himself was under the delusion that Moses personally wrote the Pentateuch (Matthew 19:8 cf. Deuteronomy 24), even though the evidence shows that Moses couldn’t have (for instance, how did he write about his own death and burial in Deuteronomy 34? – or, how could Moses claim Abraham’s army chased his enemy as far as “Dan” at Genesis 14:14, when Laish was not named Dan until long after Moses died according to Judges 18:27-29? – plus many more examples).

      It is quite odd that Atheists quote more of the bible (and more often) than you do, isn’t it?

      GD Star Rating
      loading...

    • The Truth

      God Bless you for planting the seed of Truth.
      It is not up to us who is the good soil with a heart to hear,
      and who is the corrupt soil, darkened by the evil one in their thinking.
      “Bless those who curse you, and pray for those who mistreat you” Luke 6:28

      GD Star Rating
      loading...

    • DirkvD

      “I am sorry you are so empty and sad in your life that you feel the need to tear down the beliefs of others, so that you add justification to your ideals.” Really you’re going there? who is trying to teach religion in science class? Do you have a bunch of scientist protesting outside your Sunday schools demanding that they should be allowed to correct all the errors in your book? Do scientist protect other scientist pedophiles from the law? Do they believe and promote slavery, genital mutilation, stoning? Chistian Intelligence is an efing oxymoron.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...

  3. sandman5
    sandman5

    ah my Brother Razi, you are to be commended on your research. you are a blessing to Godswill Ministries and atheists everywhere. may you continue to be a bane to religious nuts.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...

    • Brother Razi

      Thank you sandman5! I will continue to be a bane to religious nuts as long as the FSM (or your chosen deified parody) grants me the wisdom to drink bourbon and the digits with which to drunkenly offend spell-check.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...

  4. 762x51hk

    Wow , great article. What amazes me is Christians claim the Bible is the foundation of their faith,yet they dont know whats in it.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...

    • The Truth

      The key is faith. Where a Christian has faith, faithless people by definition do not. The problem with people who are Anti-Christian is they do not know the scriptures, nor do they take them in Context, nor to be honest do they care to know. Hence the saying “do not cast your pearls to pigs”. Many people, such as yourself do not want to know God. Because that way you can justify your Evil actions. What B. Raz does not and can not understand is the grace of God, and the Truth of God. Leviticus 18 Speaks about sexual relations, and things that are Wrong. Included in that is Abortion. Job 3 calls an unborn child, an infant. Ezekiel 18 says do not punish the child for the sins of the father. Also their is a reason baby’s are called “Unborn Child”. What amazes me, is how people can pick and choose a few seperate scriptures and presume to know the mind of Christ, without faith in Christ.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...

      • Reverend Threefinker the Freethinker

        Let me summon the force of the late, great Christopher Hitchens yet again, to deal with this drivel:

        FAITH is the suspension of critical thinking. What you are doing, “Truth,” is using your disregard of evidence, and wanton clinging to your desired belief, to justify the worldview that you wish so hard to be true.

        Like the rest of us freethinkers, channel what limited mental powers you have to collecting information and basing your conclusions on objective analysis, rather than starting with a conclusion and cherry-picking your archaic “holy” book for evidence you can exploit to your whims, all-the-while continuing to ignore myriads of passages, in that SAME book, which refute your rose-colored perception of a corrupt, malevolent text.

        GD Star Rating
        loading...

      • Sal

        Yep, guess we cast our pearls to swine. :P

        GD Star Rating
        loading...

  5. Reverend Duncan

    Likewise, an excellent contribution!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...

  6. Brother Gamutman

    Now THIS is what I'm talkin' about! This kind of article is an excellent resource. Thank you, Brother Razi. Thank you.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...

    • Brother Razi

      Brother Gamutman, you can thank me by sending a cheap bottle of bourbon, j/k :)

      Thanks for the kind words!

      GD Star Rating
      loading...


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>